Kode Mata KuliahKI7011 / 3 SKS
Penyelenggara305 - Kimia / FMIPA
KategoriKuliah
Bahasa IndonesiaEnglish
Nama Mata KuliahMetodologi Penelitian DoktorResearch Methodology for Doctoral Program
Bahan Kajian
  1. Penjelasan kurikulum program studi doktor kimia, definisi program doktor
  2. Penjelasan mengenai originalitas pada penelitian, karakteristik suatu penelitian, metode hipotesis-deduktif
  3. Uraian mengenai jenis-jenis penelitian, penentuan topik penelitian, membangun hipotesis penelitian serta metodologi dan metode
  4. Uraian mengenai cara-cara pembuatan proposal, penelusuran literatur, penentuan hipotesis, penyusunan rancangan penelitian
  5. Pemaparan caara penelitian mulai dari persiapan meneliti, memilih topk/target penelitian, tata cara pencarian literatur dan manajemen literatur, SOP, mendokumentasikan serta mempublikasikan hasil penelitian dalam bentuk presentasi oral, tesis maupun jurnal ilmiah.
  6. Pemaparan pemahaman etika ilmiah antara lain prinsip plagiarisme dan hal-hal yang harus dipenuhi/dihindari dalam melakukan penelitian.
  1. Explanation of the curriculum for the chemistry doctoral study program, definition of the doctoral program
  2. Explanation of originality in research, characteristics of research, hypothesis-deductive method
  3. Description of types of research, determining research topics, building research hypotheses and methodology and methods
  4. Description of the methods for making proposals, literature searches, determining hypotheses, preparing research designs
  5. Explanation of research methods starting from research preparation, selecting research topics/targets, procedures for literature searches and literature management, SOPs, documenting and publishing research results in the form of oral presentations, theses and scientific journals.
  6. The explanation of understanding scientific ethics includes the principles of plagiarism and things that must be met/avoided in conducting research.
Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah (CPMK)
  1. Mampu mengemukakan originalitas ide dalam perancangan penelitian berdasarkan penelaahan literatur.
  2. Mampu merancang penelitian berdasarkan metodologi ilmiah dan kaidah metode hipotesis-deduktif.
  3. Mampu menyusun rancangan penelitian dalam bentuk kerangka proposal yang sesuai dengan tata bahasa dan kaidah keilmuan yang baku.
  4. Mampu mengomunikasikan secara tulisan dan/atau lisan hasil penelaahan literatur dengan mengedepankan etika dan kejujuran.
  1. Able to express original ideas in research design based on literature review.
  2. Able to design research based on scientific methodology and the principles of the hypothesis-deductive method.
  3. Able to compile research designs in the form of proposal frameworks that comply with standard grammar and scientific rules.
  4. Able to communicate in writing and/or orally the results of literature reviews while prioritizing ethics and honesty.
Metode PembelajaranStudi literatur, presentasi mandiri, diskusi, studi kasusLiterature study, independent presentation, discussion, case study
Modalitas PembelajaranLuring Sinkron Daring AsinkronSynchronous Offline Asynchronous Online
Jenis NilaiABCDE
Metode PenilaianPenilaian Kuliah didasarkan pada tugas-tugas mandiri dan pembuatan proposal, dengan bobot masing-masing adalah 40 dan 60% dari skala 100. Penilaian diberikan sesuai rubrik indicator kinerja pada Dokumen Kurikulum Program Doktor Kimia FMIPA – ITB merujuk pada Tabel 8.2 – 8.5, yaitu: • Angka 1 = sangat buruk (Nilai < 40); • Angka 2 = buruk/unsatisfactory (40 ≤ Nilai < 55); • Angka 3 = cukup/developing (55 ≤ Nilai < 70); • Angka 4 = baik/satisfactory (70 ≤ Nilai < 85); • Angka 5 = sangat baik/exemplary (Nilai ≥ 85). Indeks Nilai: A ≥ 4,0; 3,5 ≤ AB < 4,0; 3,0 ≤ B < 3,5; 2,5 ≤ BC < 3,0 2,0 ≤ C < 2,5; 1,5 ≤ D < 2,0; E < 1,5Course assessment is based on independent assignments and proposal writing, with weights of 40 and 60%, respectively, on a scale of 100. Assessment is given according to the performance indicator rubric in the Chemistry Doctoral Program Curriculum Document, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences – Bandung Institute of Technology (FMIPA – ITB), referring to Tables 8.2–8.5, namely: • Score 1 = very poor (Score < 40); • Score 2 = poor/unsatisfactory (40 ≤ Score < 55); • Score 3 = adequate/developing (55 ≤ Score < 70); • Score 4 = good/satisfactory (70 ≤ Score < 85); • Score 5 = very good/exemplary (Score ≥ 85). Grade Index: A ≥ 4.0; 3.5 ≤ AB < 4.0; 3.0 ≤ B < 3.5; 2.5 ≤ BC < 3.0 2.0 ≤ C < 2.5; 1.5 ≤ D < 2.0; E < 1.5
Catatan Tambahan